[Top 5] Best Sims 4 Abuse Mod Scenarios to Try in Your Game
It features all the tweaks of Wicked Whims without any of the unnecessary adult content that some fans would prefer to avoid. Players who want their sims to exhibit realistic behavior will be well-serviced by this mod.
sims 4 abuse mod
A Discord Moderator on the official Apex legends server (discord.gg/apexlegends) Called *Snip*, have instantly banned me permanently without warning and only for saying "I'm 9 years old".*Snip*First of all, I read the whole #rules-and-info Section, and there is no rule prevent me for saying such a thing, secondly, everyone were lying about their age and it was clear we were only kidding and not being serious about that, BUT IM THE ONLY ONE WHO GOT BANNED !This is not the first time i see an abuse of power, last time, another Moderator forced me to change my Discord Pseudo name because according to him "??????" is unclear & un-pingable name, while thats not true and already another Moderator using the same text font *Snip*This is an Official Discord for a Game made by an AAA Studio, not an amateur random discord server, so Please EA RESPAWN when you recruit new moderators, make sure that they are not Childish and rude.
FN 6. Possibly, cases of this nature may be appropriate candidates for the continuous conduct exception which has been applied in other areas of criminal law and has permitted conviction upon testimony to a pattern of conduct which by its nature is continuing. (Such cases include, most pertinent to this case, child abuse, People v. Ewing (1977) 72 Cal. App. 3d 714, 717 [140 Cal. Rptr. 299], and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, People v. Lowell (1946) 77 Cal. App. 2d 341, 346-348 [175 P.2d 846]; as well as spousal battery (People v. Thompson (1984) 160 Cal. App. 3d 220, 224 [206 Cal.Rptr. 516]); pimping (People v. Lewis (1978) 77 Cal. App. 3d 455, 460-462 [143 Cal. Rptr. 587, 3 A.L.R.4th 1185]); and harboring a felon (People v. Gunn (1987) 197 Cal. App. 3d 408 [242 Cal.Rptr. 834]). However, the doctrine has been rejected in a case of sodomy and oral copulation occurring in a continuous crime spree. (People v. Madden (1981) 116 Cal. App. 3d 212, 218 [171 Cal.Rptr. 897]).) People v. Luna, supra, states that the Castro and Williams decisions have foreclosed the application of the doctrine to resident child molester cases. (See People v. Luna, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at p. 749.)